NON-FEDERAL PHYSICAL PROPERTY ANNUAL STEWARDSHIP INFORMATION, SEPTEMBER 30, 2006 TRANSPORTATION INVESTMENTS
Dollars in Thousands |
FY 2002 |
FY 2003 |
FY 2004 |
FY 2005 |
FY 2006 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Surface Transportation |
|||||
Federal Highway Administration |
|||||
Federal Aid Highways (HTF) |
$ 29,377,231 |
$ 29,258,796 |
$ 29,207,012 |
$ 29,750,120 |
$ 32,190,231 |
Other Highway Trust Fund Programs |
211,883 |
243,874 |
300,493 |
445,083 |
452,022 |
General Fund Programs |
31,616 |
73,046 |
243,874 |
300,493 |
445,083 |
Appalachian Development System |
146,306 |
128,480 |
263,430 |
425,810 |
366,816 |
Federal Motor Carrier |
149,091 |
159,628 |
299,450 |
195,740 |
117,004 |
Federal Transit Administration |
|||||
Discretionary Grants |
$ 495,322 |
$ 291,889 |
$ 160,655 |
$ 119,277 |
$ 91,961 |
Formula Grants |
4,283,634 |
4,390,965 |
4,723,674 |
4,521,288 |
3,376,068 |
Capital Investment Grants |
† 2,371,521 |
2,632,841 |
2,788,920 |
3,375,206 |
3,073,294 |
Washington Metro |
89,227 |
11,252 |
12,409 |
1,719 |
4,255 |
Interstate Transfer Grants |
8,155 |
9,459 |
1,479 |
1,411 206 |
|
Formula and Bus Grants |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
1,862,772 |
Surface Transportation Non-Federal Physical Property Investments |
$ 37,163,986 |
$ 37,200,230 |
$ 38,719,892 |
$ 39,166,444 |
$ 39,686,097 |
Air Transportation |
|||||
Federal Aviation Administration |
|||||
Airport Improvement Program |
$ 2,933,542 |
$ 2,786,717 |
$ 2,977,300 |
$ 3,712,423 |
$ 3,852,141 |
Air Transportation Non-Federal Physical Property Investments |
$ 2,933,542 |
$ 2,786,717 |
$ 2,977,300 |
$ 3,712,423 |
$ 3,852,141 |
Total Non-Federal Physical Property Investments
|
$ 40,097,528 |
$ 39,986,947 |
$ 41,697,192 |
$ 42,878,867 |
$ 43,538,238 |
† Fiscal Year 2003 outlays are not net of Federal Emergency Management Administration (FEMA) collection of $2.75 billion.
The Federal Highway Administration reimburses States for construction costs on projects related to the Federal Highway System of roads. The main programs in which the States participate are the National Highway System, Interstate Systems, Surface Transportation Program, and Congestion Mitigation/Air Quality Improvement. The States’ contribution is ten percent for the Interstate System and twenty percent for most other programs.
The Federal Transit Administration provides grants to State and local transit authorities and agencies.
Formula grants provide capital assistance to urban and nonurban areas and may be used for a wide variety of mass transit purposes, including planning, construction of facilities, and purchases of buses and railcars. Funding also includes providing transportation to meet the special needs of elderly individuals and individuals with disabilities.
Capital investment grants, which replaced discretionary grants in 1999, provide capital assistance to finance acquisition, construction, reconstruction, and improvement of facilities and equipment. Capital investment grants fund the categories of new starts, fixed guideway modernization, and bus and bus-related facilities.
Washington Metro provides funding to support the construction of the Washington Metrorail System.
Interstate Transfer Grants provided Federal financing from FY 1976 through FY 1995 to allow States and localities to fund transit capital projects substituted for previously withdrawn segments of the Interstate Highway System.
The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) makes project grants for airport planning and development under the Airport Improvement Program (AIP) to maintain a safe and efficient nationwide system of public-use airports that meet both present and future needs of civil aeronautics. FAA works to improve the infrastructure of the Nation’s airports, in cooperation with airport authorities, local and State governments, and metropolitan planning authorities.
HUMAN CAPITAL INVESTMENT EXPENSES ANNUAL STEWARDSHIP INFORMATION, SEPTEMBER 30, 2006
| Dollars in Thousands | FY 2002 | FY 2003 | FY 2004 | FY 2005 | FY 2006 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Surface Transportation | |||||
| Federal Highway Administration | |||||
National Highway Institute Training |
$9,146 | $8,539 | $4,069 | $11,844 | $14,123 |
| Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration | |||||
California Highway Patrol |
926 |
192 |
41 |
— |
|
Idaho Video |
199 |
593 |
344 |
208 |
— |
Kentucky IT Conference |
175 |
||||
Massachusetts Training Academy |
25 |
175 |
9 |
53 |
— |
Minnesota Crash Investigation |
18 |
57 |
21 |
— |
1 |
Federal Transit Administration † ‡ |
|||||
National Transit Institute Training |
3,946 |
4,292 |
4,667 |
3,318 |
3,961 |
| National Highway Safety Administration | |||||
Section 403 Highway Safety Programs |
83,389 |
49,013 |
53,964 |
110,981 |
221,523 |
Highway Traffic Safety Grants |
229,145 |
210,469 |
205,509 |
216,702 |
279,244 |
| Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety | |||||
| Administration | |||||
Hazardous Materials (Hazmat) Training |
7,763 |
7,782 |
7,780 |
8,065 |
7,800 |
Surface Transportation Human Capital Investments |
$333,631 |
$281,846 |
$276,555 |
$351,212 |
$526,827 |
| Maritime Transportation | |||||
| Maritime Administration | |||||
State Maritime Academies Training ‡ |
$8,257 |
$8,363 |
$9,208 |
$9,215 |
$7,528 |
Additional Maritime Training |
463 |
463 |
388 |
328 |
134 |
Maritime Transportation Human Capital Investments |
$8,720 |
$8,826 |
9,596 |
9,543 |
7,662 |
Total Human Capital Investments |
$342,351 |
$290,672 |
$286,151 |
$360,755 |
$534,489 |
† FY 2002 outlay amounts are based on the enacted budget authority for FYs 1999, 2000, and 2001, and on the approved outlay rates for the National Transit Institute (5 %, 50%, 40%, and 5%).
‡ Does not include funding for the Student Incentive Payment Program, which produces graduates who are obligated to serve in a reserve component of the U.S. armed forces.
The National Highway Institute develops and conducts various training courses for all aspects of Federal Highway Administration. Students are typically from the State and local police, State highway departments, public safety and motor vehicle employees, and U.S. citizens and foreign nationals engaged in highway work of interest to the U.S. Types of courses given and developed are modern developments, technique, management, planning, environmental factors, engineering, safety, construction, and maintenance.
The California Highway Patrol educates the trucking industry for the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration about Federal and State commercial motor vehicle/carrier inspection procedures, and increased commercial motor vehicle driver awareness. The Idaho Video Program develops video training material utilized by FMCSA National Training Center for the purpose of training State and local law enforcement personnel. The Massachusetts Training Academy provides training to State law enforcement personnel located in the northeast region of Massachusetts. The Minnesota Crash Investigation program provides training and develops processes and protocols for commercial motor vehicle crash investigations.
The National Transit Institute of the Federal Transit Administration develops and offers training courses to improve transit planning and operations. Technology courses cover such topics as alternative fuels, turnkey project delivery systems, communications-based train controls, and integration of advanced technologies.
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration’s programs authorized under the Highway Trust Fund provide resources to State and local governments, private partners, and the public to effect changes in driving behavior on the Nation’s highways to increase safety belt usage and reduce impaired driving. NHTSA provides technical assistance to all States on the full range of components of the impaired driving system as well as conducting demonstrations, training, and public information/education on safety belt usage.
The Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration administers Hazardous Material Training (Hazmat). The purpose of Hazmat Training is to train State and local emergency personnel on the handling of hazardous materials in the event of a hazardous material spill or storage problem.
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT INVESTMENTS ANNUAL STEWARDSHIP INFORMATION, SEPTEMBER 30, 2006
|
Dollars in Thousands
|
FY 2002 |
FY 2003 |
FY 2004 |
FY 2005 |
FY 2006 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Surface Transportation
|
|||||
Federal Highway Administration |
|||||
Intelligent Transportation Systems |
124,950 $ |
126,256 $ |
146,852 $ |
183,634 $ |
129,219 |
Other Applied Research & Development |
183,142 |
115,368 |
142,557 |
114,315 |
105,336 |
Federal Railroad Administration |
|||||
Railroad Research & Development Program |
9,600 |
2,402 |
9,342 |
6,032 |
11,681 |
Federal Transit Administration |
|
|
|
|
|
Applied Research and Development Transit Planning and Research † |
1,931 |
3,895 |
3,483 |
2,546 |
6,543 |
Transit University Transportation Centers ‡ |
8,168 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
Office of the Secretary |
|||||
Applied Research and Development Emergency Transportation |
137 |
650 |
8 |
— |
— |
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Applied Research and Development Pipeline Safety Hazardous Materials |
4,000 233 |
5,523 1,755 |
6,375 1,489 |
10,810 1,638 |
11,705 2,204 |
Research and Innovative Technology Administration Applied Research and Development Research and Technology |
1,608 |
1,454 |
1,134 |
1,564 |
1,110 |
Surface Transportation Research and Development Investments |
333,769 $ |
257,303 $ |
311,240 $ |
320,539 $ |
267,798 |
Air Transportation |
|||||
Federal Aviation Administration
|
|||||
Research and Development Plant |
3,020 $ |
2,903 $ |
4,230 $ |
5,287 $ |
3,821 |
Applied Research |
59,150 |
29,406 |
91,743 |
103,659 |
106,390 |
Development |
603 |
251 |
478 |
547 |
587 |
Administration |
44,480 |
31,669 |
28,643 |
29,163 |
30,566 |
Air Transportation Research and Development Investments |
$ 107,253 |
$ 64,229 |
$ 125,094 |
$ 138,656 |
$ 141,364 |
Total Research and Development Investments |
$ 441,022 |
$ 321,532 |
$ 436,334 |
$ 459,195 |
$ 409,162 |
† FY 2002 updated with Transit Cooperative Research Program estimate based on actual outlays.
‡ FY 2002 updated based on actual research and development related outlays.
The Federal Highway Administration’s research and development programs are earmarks in the appropriations bills for the fiscal year. Typically these programs are related to safety, pavements, structures, and environment. Intelligent Transportation Systems were created to promote automated highways and vehicles to enhance the national highway system. The output is in accordance with the specifications within the appropriations act.
The Federal Transit Administration supports research and development in the following program areas:
The Office of the Secretary’s Office of Emergency Transportation is involved in research and development in mapping software for the Crisis Management Center, transportation policy, and outreach efforts.
The Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration funds research and development activities for the following organizations and activities:
The Research and Innovative Technology Administration’s Office of Research and Technology is involved in research and development for the University of Technology and Education.
The Federal Aviation Administration conducts research and provides the essential air traffic control infrastructure to meet increasing demands for higher levels of system safety, security, capacity, and efficiency. Research priorities include aircraft structures and materials; fire and cabin safety; crash injury-protection; explosive detection systems; improved in-flight icing and ground de-icing operations; better tools to predict and warn of weather hazards, turbulence and wake vortices; aviation medicine, and human factors.
FAA uses a complicated process to track and account for billions of dollars in capital investments. The majority of these investments are needed to modernize the air traffic control system—a critical national infrastructure. This multiyear development effort involves the extensive use of advanced technologies. While under development, all spending must be carefully tracked and recorded in the CIP account. When commissioned into use, these investments must be reclassified as in-service assets, which are then subject to depreciation.