![]() |
|
|
FMCSA 08-08
Friday, November 21, 2008
Contact: DaRhonda McDuffie
Tel.: (202) 366-9999
Federal Court Grants Request for a Temporary Restraining Order to Stop Unsafe
Motor Carrier from Operating
WASHINGTON – The U.S. District Court for South Dakota on Tuesday granted a
request of the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), the U.S.
Department of Transportation (DOT), and the Department of Justice (DOJ) to
immediately halt the operations of Action Carrier, Inc., of Sioux Falls, South
Dakota, an unsafe interstate motor carrier that had repeatedly refused to comply
with federal motor carrier safety regulations.
"We have no tolerance for operators that attempt to continue operating while
potentially endangering the traveling public," said John H. Hill, Federal Motor
Carrier Safety Administrator. "We will continue to work with the DOT and DOJ to
halt the operations of any carriers that attempt to continue operating after
their authority has been revoked."
Federal District Judge Lawrence L. Piersol granted DOT’s request for a temporary
restraining order preventing Action Carrier from continuing to operate in
interstate commerce after its operating authority was revoked by FMCSA because
the carrier did not have the necessary liability insurance. Federal law requires
interstate motor carriers to obtain operating authority from FMCSA in order to
conduct operations, to have minimum levels of public liability insurance, and to
file proof of the insurance with FMCSA.
Action Carrier has a history of continuing to operate for extended periods after
revocation of its authority for failing to meet FMCSA’s insurance requirements.
Over the last year, FMCSA initiated three separate civil penalty proceedings for
operating without insurance and operating after revocation of authority. The
most recent revocation order issued by FMCSA was on October 6, 2008. Following
that order, FMCSA and state authorities documented at least 16 additional
incidents of illegal transportation in interstate commerce by Action Carrier
despite the latest revocation order.
The court scheduled a hearing on a preliminary injunction for next Tuesday,
November 25.
###