Performance
measures:
Average yearly percent change in
transit passenger-miles traveled per transit market, adjusted for employment
levels.
Target:
1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004
N/A N/A N/A
3.5 2.0 2.0
Actual:
5.0 5.0 4.3
N/A
N/A Not available.
Note on
data: In FY 2002, DOT
changed the measure of transit ridership from the change in total passenger
miles traveled to the average change in passenger miles traveled per market. The previous performance measure placed
undue emphasis on increasing ridership in the nation’s very largest urban
areas. The FY 2002 measure improved
this by focusing more attention on increasing transit ridership in every
community.
After a
year of experience, DOT has concluded that weighting the new measure for
employment levels in each transit market allows DOT to better account for the
impact of economic conditions on transit use.
A recent study by San Jose State University’s Mineta Transportation
Institute found that change in employment is a key economic factor associated
with change in transit ridership. This
finding is consistent with the fact that approximately one-half of transit
riders are traveling to and from work.
Employment levels also reflect the financial capacity of local
governments to support transit service levels and keep fares stable. An increase in the average transit ridership
per market, adjusted for changes in employment, represents an increase in
transit’s share of the personal travel market.

External
Factors: Communities are
spreading farther away from central cities, and jobs are increasingly located
in the suburbs. This creates longer commutes and more scattered travel
patterns. Rural areas and small communities are shifting from an agricultural
to a service and manufacturing economy, creating a demand for public
transportation.
Strategies and Initiatives
to Achieve 2004 Target:
DOT resources attributable to this performance goal are depicted
below:

FTA:
▪
provides grants to
States and localities to develop new transit systems and extend existing
systems,
▪
provides transportation
planning assistance to ensure that public transit systems are accessible,
convenient, and well managed;
▪
funds research and
deployment of transit technologies, which increase the reliability of transit,
reduce trip time, and improve connectivity between modes; and innovative
technologies such as fuel cells, hybrid electric buses, and alternative fuels
that are less polluting than diesel fuels;
▪
supports development,
deployment and dissemination of information on the bus rapid transit (BRT)
technologies, which may reduce travel time and offer low capital cost
alternatives to heavy and light rail transit service; and
▪
supports training for
transit agency employees responsible for planning, designing, building,
operating and maintaining transit systems.
FTA also works to improve the safety of
public transit. All of these efforts implemented in various combinations by the
State and local transit agencies stimulate urban and inter-urban mobility
through increased transit ridership.
This has spin-off benefits in reducing congestion and mobile source
pollutant emissions.
In 2004, FTA will:
▪
invest in transit
infrastructure to create new transit services, make transit available to more
people in both urbanized and rural areas, and improve the condition of current
transit services;
▪
provide funds to
Metropolitan Planning Organizations and State DOTs for planning activities to
ensure that new transit services are accessible, convenient, and well managed;
▪
conduct research and
demonstrations of technology to improve rail communications systems,
innovations in transit operation to improve mobility management and fleet
management; and
▪
provide funds to the
National Transit Institute to deliver approximately 180 training courses in
Safety and Security, Multimodal Transportation Planning, Advanced Technologies,
and Management Development.
FTA supplementary
performance measures:
Passenger-miles traveled (in billions)
by transit.
Target:
1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004
--- 40.56 44.8
47.5 48.0 48.8
Actual:
43.3 45.1 46.3
47.1#
Average condition of motor bus fleet (on a scale of 1 (poor) to 5
(excellent)).
Target:
1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004
N/A 3.15 3.20
3.25 3.20 3.24
Actual:
3.13 3.07(r) 3.11(r)
N/A
Average condition of rail
vehicle fleet (on a scale of 1 (poor) to 5 (excellent)).
Target:
1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004
N/A 3.19 3.24
3.29 3.55 3.55
Actual:
3.14 3.55(r)
3.58(r) N/A
(r) Revised;
N/A Not available.
Other Federal
Programs with Common Outcomes:
DOT coordinates transportation, housing, economic development and environmental
programs with several other Federal agencies.
DOT and the Department of Health and Human Services jointly encourage
local Medicare agencies to use regularly scheduled transit service for medical
appointments in lieu of more expensive, specialized transportation. DOT and the Environmental Protection Agency
jointly promote the Commuter Choice initiative that mitigates congestion and
encourages transit use, and implement joint transportation planning and
environmental guidance.